Tech

The Privacy Paradox: Why We Don't Practice What We Preach

Joan Westenberg

Oct 17, 2024 — 6 min read

We say we value privacy. So why the fuck do we keep giving away our data? It’s more complicated than you think.

As a journalist and tech fan, I’m relatively “passionate” about privacy; I attend conferences, I do the reading and I write blog posts and essays about the importance of protecting personal information. In short, I know the damn assignment.

But then I reach for my phone to check my social media feed, and before I even think about it, I’ve granted a new app access to my contacts, location, and photo library. Seriously, it’s almost pathological.

And my behavior isn't an anomaly. Believe me, I’m not that fucking special.

It's the privacy paradox – the glaring disconnect between our stated preferences about privacy and our actual online behaviour.

The Paradox Unveiled

In 1978, long before we all became chronically fucking online, a privacy researcher named Alan Westin began conducting surveys that would shape our understanding of privacy attitudes for decades to come.

Westin's work, spanning over a quarter-century, categorized people into three groups based on their privacy concerns:

Privacy Fundamentalists (about 25% of the population): These individuals are highly concerned about privacy and resistant to sharing personal information.
Privacy Pragmatists (about 57%): This group weighs the benefits and risks of sharing information on a case-by-case basis.
Privacy Unconcerned (about 18%): These individuals have little to no concern about privacy and freely share personal information.

These categories seem to offer a neat explanation for people's varying online behaviors. But here's where things get interesting: even many of those classified as "Privacy Fundamentalists" readily shared personal information when put to the test in experimental settings.

This discrepancy became even more pronounced with the rise of social media in the early 2000s. A 2006 study by researchers Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross found no significant relationship between individuals' stated privacy concerns and their actual information disclosure on Facebook.

It's as if we're all living in two parallel universes: one where we vehemently defend our right to privacy, and another where we willingly hand over our most personal information for the slightest convenience or social reward.

Infinite Leverage

We revere the tangible above all else — money, technology, and measurable connections. These are the things we can see, touch, quantify, and display as proof of our progress and success. We dedicate ourselves to chasing traditional forms of leverage. We work tirelessly to accumulate wealth, believing it will grant us

Don’t Confuse Volume with Truth

The human species isn’t on a steady decline into stupidity—it just feels that way. Why? because now everyone has a microphone. A few decades ago, the loudest voices in the room were filtered by effort, editors, publishers, broadcasters, academics, or sometimes just the looming threat of social ostracization.

Rebel Optimism: How We Thrive in a Broken World

The world is crumbling in real time—I’m not here to argue that point. We’ve got rising seas swallowing cities, political chaos run by arsonist clowns with their pants on fire trying to set everything else alight, inequality so vast it feels cosmic, wars driven by fragile egos

"World War 3" is Not Inevitable: How Sequential Thinking Shapes Our Perception of Conflict

The moment we started numbering world wars like entries in a blockbuster movie franchise, we set ourselves up for failure. The war of 1914 was called The Great War at the time. But when we renamed it “World War I,” it was both a historical label and an unintentional promise.