Social media is the creator’s dilemma.

Before the internet transformed how creators distribute work, we operated in relative obscurity, largely dependent on gatekept channels like galleries, record labels and publishing houses. And, honestly, it sucked. The underground movements and the DIY movements were a strong push towards creative independence. But it was still a hard slog.

Traditionally, only those lucky few who landed representation or a coveted media slot reached wider audiences. Creators toiled in isolation, perfecting their craft with no direct fan access. Outside of niche circles, few could support themselves solely through creative work. The long prevalent “starving artist” stereotype reflected this reality.

Beyond inaccessibility, traditional distribution channels severely constrained creative freedom through the editing process and authority of trad gatekeeping. To disseminate work, creators became accustomed to relinquishing control over final outputs. With no direct audience feedback, they created within existing industry formulas rather than exploring the full contours of their talents.

Getting “discovered” meant a trade-off between integrity and exposure.

We will never know how many talented voices slipped through the cracks their entire lives, unable to break into exclusionary old media systems.

When the internet emerged, early online tools like personal websites, blogs and forums offered creators fledgling ways to publish work and engage niche communities independently. By removing gatekeepers, these Web 1.0 innovations provided glimpses into direct audience connections.

The onset of Web 2.0 and user-generated platforms like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter unleashed unprecedented distribution and engagement capacities for creators. Social media opened floodgates for creators to instantly access global audiences for free. Practically overnight, nobodies could become somebodies with a single viral post. An internet celebrity class emerged from grassroots creativity rather than top-down Hollywood engineering.

As streaming media improved and smartphones proliferated, video-centric apps like Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat enhanced creative possibilities. Where websites had once reigned supreme, nimble social platforms now captured youth attention and zeitgeist energy through digestible slideshows, vlogs and reels.

Whereas record deals and film financing traditionally enabled content creation, now social media provides the infrastructure for exponential audience building. Mass followings directly translate into paying sponsorship opportunities and ancillary income streams like merchandise sales. Rather than endlessly pitching gatekeepers, creators can invest in social channels to finance their creative careers independently.

While early internet tools introduced basic self-publishing features, today’s platforms incorporate advanced analytics for data-driven content strategies. Creators gain granular insights into audience demographics, engagement metrics and preferences to improve output iteratively. Tailored targeting functionalities help efficiently promote content to grow creators’ followers strategically.

Two decades into the social media era, both established and emerging creators rely exclusively on digital platforms to create cultural impact and sustain themselves financially. With billions of collective users, leading apps like YouTube, Instagram and TikTok each boast a staggering demographic influence. This sheer reach offers unprecedented promotional capacities for those looking to get their work seen.

For cultural voices long overlooked within legacy systems, social media ushered in a golden age of independence, visibility and authentic self-expression.

At least for a time.

But make no mistake - our reliance on social media platforms, to the detriment of every other method of sharing, consuming and engaging with creative work, has a dark side. Yes, in many ways, social media has been a godsend for independent creators seeking self-determined careers on their terms. But our over-reliance on proprietary platforms has created an existential threat to the stability, integrity and autonomy of the creative path.

Consumers spend less time than ever actively watching films or TV shows beyond whatever is trending or is talked about on TikTok. They read less. They listen less. Without the endorsement of a viral hashtag. And this abandonment of any alternative to social reach leaves creators vulnerable and unmoored.

Take the frequent visibility rule changes across leading apps. Regular algorithm updates dramatically shuffle content reach and search placements based on engagement signals like comments, shares and watch time. A single tweak can tank posts from millions of views per entry to just a few thousand, devastating income and revenue sources. Or suddenly elevate an unknown into ultra-popularity.

It pressures creators to play relentless popularity contests rather than dedicate time to meaningfully developing skills and artistic visions. The Pavlovian feedback loops are baked into platforms that gamify content interactions, but they discourage substantive connections. What draws initial curiosity differs from what captivates audiences over the long term.

Platforms censor or remove inappropriate content as judged by their internal standards-setting boards or an entirely random assignation of a moderation ticket to a biased content reviewer. Opaque processes open the door to unfair or skewed moderation, a controversy exemplified by high-profile creator account suspensions. Systemic monetisation denial and restrictive branding partnerships constrain full creative expression. And increasingly, platforms allow only sanitised corporate-friendly content to access revenue streams.

Social apps claim full ownership over published content while controlling audience access through proprietary algorithms. Account suspensions and deletions sever direct creator-to-follower relationships with no viable recourse options. Recurring data leaks reveal how platforms exploit user information for advertising profits with little regard for security or privacy.

And there's no simple solution to this predicament. There's no effortless escape from the modern creators' dilemma. If you surrender to the call of social media, it will drain and deplete your creative energy, consume your precious time, and undermine your mental health and overall well-being. But if you resist the allure, you willingly forfeit your opportunity to have your voice heard, to have your talent recognized, and to be seen by a wider audience. It is a delicate balance, a tightrope that creators must walk. And likely, walk blindfolded.

Lasting creative processes need more than a distribution channel. We only thrive as creators when we’re nurturing the human dimensions of art over chasing quantified popularity.

The lure of “going viral” and the ease of distribution can obscure what matters most: honing our craft and connecting with engaged communities. Though platforms prize slick packaging and shorthand novelty, I will always believe that artists who persevere in developing unique voices and purpose-driven output can retain creative control.

Creators can use social media on their own terms to amplify enduring ideas that resonate across the churning wasteland of the modern web. But only by standing confidently in their vision instead of chasing trends,

Rather than put all eggs in one basket, creators should diversify distribution across owned channels like email lists and websites, along with offline RSS feeds. Start group chats and grow them. Balance visibility with retaining power over creative output and direct community connections beyond any one platform’s vested interests. Complement social posting with consistent skill-building and artistic purpose and stay anchored in the face of algorithmic volatility.

@Westenberg logo
Subscribe to @Westenberg and never miss a post.